Next Salon Discussion

Bold curators make for better art, don't they? Sunday 21 September 2014, 6:00pm start

Monday 22nd Sept: Cycling: four wheels good, two wheels better?

Mark Birbeck, Gabriele Schliwa, Helen Nugent and Nick Vaughan will introduce a discussion on improving the road experience for all

Public forum for engaging and debating ideas
PDF Print E-mail
Salon Discussions

Bold curators make for better art, don't they? Sunday 21 September 2014, 6:00pm startCurators and their audience

Sunday 21st September, 6:00pm start

Pauline Hadaway, Sarah Perks, and Wendy Earle will unpick the changing role of curators and how we could save them from becoming museum pieces

 

Pauline HadawayIn line with many aspects of work in the arts and humanities today, the role of the curator has been re-configured in a political and philosophical environment which increasingly values the external impacts of art – social, economic and therapeutic, against its meaning as an intrinsic aspect of human experience and culture.

 

Sarah PerksIn Art as Therapy, a depressingly narrow and instrumental manifesto for improving visitor experience in art museums, Alain de Botton and John Armstrong argue for curators to abandon scholarship acquired in the ‘secluded privilege’ of the traditional museum, in favour of discovering the therapeutic value of art. Curators in de Botton’s new therapeutic art museum should programme exhibitions designed to help visitors find resolution for ‘life’s difficult issues’. Whilst art history may seem remote from everyday life, de Botton and Armstrong’s proposition that museums and galleries abandon belief in the value of scholarship in favour of more immersive, visitor focused experiences denigrates the idea of the audience as an intelligent, enquiring public.

Read more...
 
PDF Print E-mail
Salon Discussions

Cycling: four wheels good, two wheels better? Monday 22 September 2014, 6:45pm startCycling: four wheels good, two wheels better?

Monday 22nd September, 6:45pm start

IET CommunitiesMark Birbeck, Gabriele Schliwa, Helen Nugent and Nick Vaughan will introduce a discussion on improving the road experience for all, chaired by Keith McCabe

 

Mark BirbeckHaving a bicycle for a child was often a precursor to travelling beyond the physical confines of your neighbourhood, and the first steps to adolescent freedom. Getting on your bike and visiting friends without needing a lift from mum and dad, or being able to cycle to the countryside away from the watchful eyes of adults has long been a rite of passage for teenagers. Though older generations may have known bicycles as their only mode of transport for going to work, most people now have access to a car yet many commuters are frustrated by congestion, and a plethora of impediments on the road. A return to the bicycle as a realistic form of transport is being publicly promoted, so what are we to make of such campaigns to get us on our bike again?

 

Gabriele SchliwaMuch is made of the health benefits of getting the nation out of cars and back on two wheels; indeed the government has designed tax schemes to incentivise us to buy a bike. Are we to believe they want us to experience that freedom we did as kids to whizz down a hill with our feet off the peddles, for no other reason than to feel the wind in your hair? That's clearly stretching things, but there's definitely a social trend to emphasise cycling as a modern and desired form of transport, well exemplified by the Mayor of London, Boris Johnson, taking every opportunity to promote it. Manchester may not yet have the cycle hire infrastructure of London, but the introduction of many more cycle lanes on main arterial routes, and the Tour de France visiting the region is a step in that direction.

Read more...
 
PDF Print E-mail
Salon Discussions

North and South: a siren call to tame industrial ambition? - Wednesday 8 October 2014, 6:45pm start North and South: a siren call to tame industrial ambition?

Wednesday 8th October, 6:00pm start

Angelica Michelis, Helen Nugent, Alan Shelston and Vanessa Pupavac will open a discussion on what North and South says about society today, chaired by Pauline Hadaway

 

Angelica MichelisCostume dramas of nineteenth century Britain, self-consciously becoming more gritty than rosy, have recently captured the popular imagination way beyond the more prissy offerings of the 1970's. To mark the opening of the newly refurbished Elizabeth Gaskell House in October, this Salon discussion is going to have a look at what insights Gaskell's novel North and South, first published in 1855, offers us in understanding the dynamics of Britain's industrial revolution and what if anything it can tell us about society today. There is common reference made to a North / South divide, but compared to the times of Elizabeth Gaskell, Charles Dickens, the Bronte sisters, and even Thomas Hardy is there still such a difference, and if so how does that present itself and what characteristics prevail? How should we be reading novels from different historical periods, and are we likely to misread them when transposing their messages for today?

Helen Nugent

 

In contrast to some earlier novels, with their own critique of the 'self-made man' from a capitalism dominated by individuals, Elizabeth Gaskell helps herald in a new genre of the social problem novel located in industrial Britain. North and South is notable, although not the first, in not dismissing industrialisation, with the heroine Margaret Hale acknowledging that her celebration of the countryside might be bit romantic and whilst cottage workers might be poorer, there was a real hope of overcoming the dangerous and insecure conditions for industrial workers.

Read more...
 
PDF Print E-mail
Salon Discussions

Writers and WarWriters and war: reflecting or shaping our perceptions?

Saturday 25 October, 11:30am start

Shirley Dent, Jane Potter and others will look at how literature shapes our perceptions of war, chaired by Rania Hafez

 

Shirley Dent

Dulce et Decorum est Pro patria mori. Whether schooled in the classics or not, this is the one line of Latin that most of us can probably recall from our school days and our introduction to war poetry through Wilfred Owen’s visceral and haunting lyrics. Next to Owen’s young soldiers bent double like old hags towing a gas-ravaged corpse we may have been asked to compare Rupert Brooke’s The Soldier, read by the Dean of St Paul’s at Easter 1915. The poem’s gold-tinted, almost giddy, expostulation to the concealed dust in some corner of a foreign field that is forever England seems as jingoistic and sentimental as Owen’s lines are tormented and disillusioned.

Dr Jane Potter

 

It is the later poets of the First World War – notably Siegfried Sassoon and Wilfred Owen – who set the timbre and tone for not just the poetry that came out of the trenches but for a genre of poetry, literature and art that deals with the subject of war. Following the trenches, gone is the sentimental glorification of sacrifice for country, replaced with the savagery and senselessness of war. If the First World War was ‘the war to end all wars’ First World War poetry is ‘the poetry to define all wars’.

Read more...
 
PDF Print E-mail
Salon Discussions

Playing God? The ethics of biomedicine - Tuesday 28 October, 6:45pm startPlaying God? The ethics of biomedicine

Tuesday 28th October 2014

Andy Miah, Sorcha Ui Chonnachtaigh, Steve Fuller and Anna Bergqvist will introduce a discussion on the ethics of biomedical enhancements

 

Andy Miah

Over the past decade, dramatic advances have been made in synthetic biotechnology, neuroscience and digital technology. Engineers of brain computer interfaces predict headbands that will deliver digitally enhanced cognition, letting us talk without speaking, see round corners, and drive just by thinking about it. In 2010, Craig Venter made headlines with his (partially) synthetic cell, and, as he plans to patent an entire manmade lifeform in the future, work continues on the creation of smaller DNA constructs known as bioparts. This year a man in Austria voluntarily had a (damaged) hand amputated so he could be fitted with a bionic limb controlled by brain signals. Stem cell science and synthetic biology bring the prospect of replacing flesh with ‘synthetic skin’ rather than creating crude cyborgs.

Dr Sorcha Ui Chonnachtaigh

 

Yet while futurists and transhumanists talk excitedly about the possibilities of biomedical enhancement, there is considerable ambivalence about such advances across wider society: the so-called ‘yuck factor.’ Ethics committees and ‘public dialogues’ have risen in prominence in recent decades partly to tackle public fears about the impacts of experimentation in controversial areas such as mitochondrial exchange, acting as a significant check on its development in the UK.

Read more...
 


Join the Salon Email List
Youtube Video of discussion on Energy
RSS Feed for discussions
Manchester Salon Facebook Group
Manchester Salon Facebook Page
Manchester Salon on Twitter