Next Salon Discussion
Monday 7th Nov: DM showcase debate: drugs in sport
Two schools debate 'We should permit the use of performance enhancing drugs in sport' at the National Football Museum
Daniel Ben-Ami and Danny Dorling introduced a discussion on the impact of inequality
There is a broad consensus that we are losing our sense of common purpose as a result of the sharp widening of economic and social inequality in western societies since the 1970s. The super-rich keep themselves aloof at the top, whilst a burgeoning underclass it is thought, if not helped, can easily be tempted into anti-social behaviour at the bottom. What is the best way to respond to this?
A defining feature of socialism was its desire to abolish class and hierarchy so that human potential could be fully realised. Conservatives, meanwhile, have typically argued that material inequality is inevitable and probably also desirable. The contemporary orthodoxy though, sometimes referred to as a “new progressivism”, is fundamentally different from the traditional views of left and right. There are growing campaigns that slate the wealthy for failing to pay their fair share of tax, like for example the Occupy protesters who claim to represent the ‘99 per cent’ against the super-rich ‘1 per cent’.
If equality was historically a core principle of the left then, so it is assumed, the current discussion and campaigns must be enlightened and humanistic. Those who oppose the plethora of apparently pro-equality initiatives are therefore cast as reactionary souls who are probably in the pay of giant corporations. So what's happened to all the conservative arguments for rewarding hard work and endeavour? Are we perhaps becoming uncomfortable with developing greater wealth and thus restraining ourselves by picking on those with more? Or will we only be able to progress if we all progress equally?
Some background readings
The Joy of Flex, by Karen Kornbluh, Washington Monthly December 2005
New progressivism is a cause to fight for, by Matthew Taylor, TES 13 November 2009
Ferraris For All, reviewed by Mark Iddon, Manchester Salon November 2010
The case for austerity among the rich, by Danny Dorling, IPPR March 2012
Rising inequality and rising austerity – when is the tipping point? by Danny Dorling, speaking at Soudings, Leeds 19 Sept 2012
Inequality and the world economy: True Progressivism, Leader, The Economist 13 October 2012
Did inequality cause the crisis? by Daniel Ben-Ami, Fund Strategy 26 November 2012
Why the rich want the super-rich to be restrained, by Daniel Ben-Ami, spiked review of books November 2012
The struggle to moralise capitalism, by Frank Furedi, spiked review of books January 2013
Inequality did not cause the crisis, by Daniel Ben-Ami, spiked 30 January 2013
Injustice: Why social inequality persists, reviewed by Ken McLaughlin, Manchester Salon February 2013
Books by the speakers, the themes of which will be discussed and debated
The Policy Press are also publishing three digital-only ebook tasters of Unequal health by Daniel Dorling, in a variety of formats. Competitively priced at only £1.99 each, they each give a flavour of three major themes: public health, social medicine and inequality and contain three relevant chapters from the book, preceded by an all-new introduction specially written by Danny Dorling.
Watch video of discussion, thanks to Dan Clayton the documentary film maker from Leeds for producing this.
Established in 1996, the aim of The Policy Press has always been to try to improve social conditions with publications that will make a positive difference to learning and research, policy and practice. In essence, we are a publisher with a purpose.